🧠
Thinking Errors & Cognitive Biases
16 questions · Science
Our brain is a master of shortcuts. It has to decide in fractions of a second, and to do so it relies on rules of thumb that usually work well and sometimes go reliably wrong. In the 1970s psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky set out to measure these slips systematically; Kahneman received the Nobel Prize in Economics for it in 2002. Ever since, our thinking errors have had names.
Some you know from everyday life. Anyone with an opinion finds support for it everywhere, and once you have bought a jacket you suddenly see it on every corner. With confirmation bias we remember the hits and overlook the rest. The anchoring effect lets a random number shift our estimate, and the halo effect turns a friendly smile into proof of competence. At the roulette table players believe that after five reds black is due, falling for the gambler’s fallacy. And anyone who keeps a project going only because so much money is already in it is caught by the sunk cost fallacy, just like the builders of Concorde.
Other biases are quieter. Hindsight bias makes us believe afterwards that we knew it all along. Survivorship bias shows us only the winners, because the losers are no longer around to tell their story. Thanks to the IKEA effect we like the shelves we assembled ourselves, the Barnum effect makes horoscopes feel uncannily accurate, and the Dunning-Kruger effect explains why beginners are often the most confident voices in the room. Knowing the names does not make you immune, but it helps you spot the traps more often before you step into them.
Practise for free
PurFact brings every card back right before you would forget it. That's how knowledge sticks.